Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023

Romina Fucà; Serena Cubico

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023

Romina Fucà^*

, Serena Cubico

Published in International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 12, Issue 2)

Received: 24 April 2024 Accepted: 23 May 2024 Published: 13 June 2024

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges, especially in shared living environments. This study explores the behavior of 39 residents, aged 17 to 91, in a Sicilian condominium, focusing on adherence to socio-juridical mandates and sanitation protocols in communal spaces post-2020 pandemic. The research builds on a previous study that examined the impact of COVID-19 during the first wave, considering factors such as meeting cancellations, social distancing, and mask mandates. The objective is to understand how these factors influenced collective decision-making during and after the pandemic and to assess the alignment of individual actions with collective goals. The present quantitative analysis investigates the trade-offs in collective decision-making, emphasizing the role of shared responsibility in mitigating risks and fostering cooperation. This study underscores the importance of condominium administrators and legal support in promoting cooperative dynamics and socio-juridical precautions for economic resilience. Metrics such as β** (ratio of individual benefit to community benefit) and θ^** (ratio of individual self-interest) are introduced to quantify their impact on decision-making processes and societal norms. Finally, this research highlights the significance of coordinated efforts and the need for effective socio-juridical frameworks to enhance communal living and ensure collective well-being during crises.

Published in	International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 12, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14
Page(s)	83-104
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Condominium Governance, Post-Pandemic, Collaborative Dynamics, Social Norms, Community Resilience, Decision-Making Processes, Collective Rationality, Shared Responsibility

References

[1]	Madsen, M. D., Paasch, J.M., and E.M. Sørensen (2022). The many faces of condominiums and various management structures − The Danish case. Land Use Policy, Volume 120, 106273, ISSN 0264-8377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106273
[2]	McKenzie, E. Common-Interest Housing in the Communities of Tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate 2003, 14(1-2), pp. 203-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2003.9521473
[3]	Çağdaş V., Paasch J.M., Paulsson J., Ploeger H., Kara, A. Co-ownership shares in condominium – A comparative analysis for selected civil law jurisdictions. Land Use Policy 2020; Volume 95, 104668, ISSN 0264-8377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104668
[4]	Camera di Commercio di Torino. La Riforma del Condominio. Legge 11 dicembre 2012, n. 220 [Italian trans. The reform of condominiums. Law December 11, 2012, no. 220]. November 11, 2013. Pp. 1-46. Retrieved at: https://www.to.camcom.it/sites/default/files/regolazione-mercato/22470_CCIAATO_18122013.pdf (last visited, March 24, 2024).
[5]	Muczyński, A. Collective renovation decisions in multi-owned housing management: the case of public-private homeowners associations in Poland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2023, 38: 2105–2127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10025-1
[6]	Gallucci, A. and Napolitano, G. Condominium assemblies, social distancing and the role of administrator and president. GECOSEI Immeubles Management, pp. 1-3. Retrieved at: https://www.gecosei.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Condominium-assemblies-social-distancing-role-of-administrator-and-president.pdf (last visited, March 24, 2024).
[7]	Hitchcock, D. (2017). Instrumental Rationality. In: On Reasoning and Argument. Argumentation Library, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_15
[8]	Colman, A.M. Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitation of rationality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2003, 26: 139–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x03000050
[9]	Pepper, J.W. and Hoelzer, G. Unveiling Mechanisms of Collective Behavior. Science 2001, 294, pp. 1466-1467. doi: 10.1126/science.1066235.
[10]	Carmichael, T., Hadžikadić, M. (2019). The Fundamentals of Complex Adaptive Systems. In: Carmichael, T., Collins, A., Hadžikadić, M. (eds) Complex Adaptive Systems. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20309-2_1
[11]	Jiménez, R., Cuesta, J.A., Lugo, H. et al. The shared reward dilemma on structured populations. J Econ Interact Coord 4, 183–193 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-009-0053-y
[12]	Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J.B., Garthoff, J., & Bentley, R.A. Agency and Identity in the Collective Self. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2022, 26(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211065921
[13]	Kaul, V. Communities and the individual: Beyond the liberal–communitarian divide. Philosophy & Social Criticism 2021, 47(4), pp. 392-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211012892
[14]	Ganzer-Ripoli J., Criado N., Lopez-Sanchez M. and Parsons S. Combining Social Choice Theory and Argumentation: Enabling Collective Decision Making. Group Decision and Negotiation 2019, 28:127–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9594-6
[15]	Ganzer-Ripoll J., Lopez-Sanchez M., and Rodriguez-Aguilar J.A. A Target-Oriented Discussion Framework to Support Collective Decision Making. pp. 481-489. In: N. Criado Pacheco et al. (Eds.): EUMAS 2016/AT 2016, LNAI 10207, pp.481–489, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59294-739
[16]	Croitoru C. Argumentative Aggregation of Individual Opinions. pp. 600-608. In: E. Fermé and J. Leite (Eds.): JELIA, 2014, LNAI 8761, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
[17]	List, C. “Social Choice Theory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/social-choice/
[18]	Horodecka, A., Vozna, L. (2021). Between Individual and Collective Rationality, pp. 139–158. In: Róna, P., Zsolnai, L., Wincewicz-Price, A. (eds) Words, Objects and Events in Economics. Virtues and Economics, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52673-3_9
[19]	Vlaev I. Local Choices: Rationality and the Contextuality of Decision-Making. Brain Sciences 2018, 8(1), pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8010008
[20]	Pinheiro, F.L., Santos, F.C., Pacheco, J.M. (2012). Evolutionary Dynamics of Cooperation under the Distributed Prisoner’s Dilemma. In: Suzuki, J., Nakano, T. (eds) Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information, and Computing Systems. BIONETICS 2010. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 87. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32615-8_51
[21]	Skimina, E., & Cieciuch, J. (2020). Explaining Everyday Behaviours and Situational Context by Personality Metatraits and Higher–Order Values. European Journal of Personality, 34(1), 29-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2230
[22]	Constantino, S.M., Schlüter, M., Weber, E.U. et al. Cognition and behavior in context: a framework and theories to explain natural resource use decisions in social-ecological systems. Sustain Sci 16, 1651–1671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00989-w
[23]	Clark, Margaret S., Edward P. Lemay, and Harry T. Reis, 'Other People as Situations: Relational Context Shapes Psychological Phenomena', in John F. Rauthmann, Ryne A. Sherman, and David C. Funder (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Psychological Situations (2020; online ed, Oxford Academic, 10 May 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263348.013.5 (last visited, March 31, 2024).
[24]	Santos, F., Santos, F. & Pacheco, J. Social norm complexity and past reputations in the evolution of cooperation. Nature 555, 242–245 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25763
[25]	Weirich, P. Collective Rationality. Equilibrium in Cooperative Games, University Press, Oxford, 2009, pp. 1–283.
[26]	McKenzie, A.J. "Evolutionary Game Theory", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/game-evolutionary/
[27]	van Kleef, G.A., Gelfand, M.J., Jetten, J. The dynamic nature of social norms: New perspectives on norm development, impact, violation, and enforcement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 84, 2019, 103814, ISSN 0022-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.05.002
[28]	Gelfand, M.J., Gavrilets, S., Nunn, N. Norm Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Social Norm Emergence, Persistence, and Change. Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18; 75: 341-378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-013319 Epub 2023 Oct 31. PMID: 37906949.
[29]	Schwartz, M.S. Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach. J Bus Ethics 2016, 139, 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8
[30]	Fehr, E., Schurtenberger, I. Normative foundations of human cooperation. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul; 2(7): 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0385-5 PMID: 31097815.
[31]	El Zein, M., Bahrami, B. & Hertwig, R. Shared responsibility in collective decisions. Nat Hum Behav 2019, 3, 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0596-4
[32]	Hertz U. Learning how to behave: cognitive learning processes account for asymmetries in adaptation to social norms. Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 9; 288(1952): 20210293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0293 Epub 2021 Jun 2. PMID: 34074119; PMCID: PMC8170188.
[33]	Gavrilets S, Tverskoi D, Sánchez A. Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11; 379(1897): 20230027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0027 Epub 2024 Jan 22. PMID: 38244599; PMCID: PMC10799741.
[34]	Andrighetto, G., Vriens, E. A research agenda for the study of social norm change. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jul 11; 380(2227): 20200411. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0411 Epub 2022 May 23. PMID: 35599567; PMCID: PMC9125228.
[35]	Arar, K., & Saiti, A. (2022). Ethical leadership, ethical dilemmas and decision making among school administrators. Equity in Education & Society, 1(1), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/27526461211070828
[36]	Pineda, J.A. (2022). A Sociological Systems Theory. In: The Social Impulse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08439-3_12
[37]	Veissière, S. P. L., Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J. D., Friston, K. J., Kirmayer, L. J. Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture. Behav Brain Sci. 2019 May 30; 43: e90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19001213 PMID: 31142395.
[38]	Febbrajo, A. Funzionalismo strutturale e sociologia del diritto nell’opera di Niklas Luhmann [eng. trans. Structural functionalism and sociology of law in Niklas Luhmann’s work, unpublished]. Milano, Giuffré, 1987, pp. IV-226, ISBN-10: 8814036152.
[39]	Chen, X., Sasaki, T., Brännström Å., Dieckmann, U. First carrot, then stick: how the adaptive hybridization of incentives promotes cooperation. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12: 20140935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0935
[40]	Morris, M.W., Hong, Y.-y., Chiu, C.-y., Liu, Z. Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 129, 2015, pp. 1-13, ISSN 0749-5978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001
[41]	Gibbs, J.L., Kim, H., & Ki, S. Investigating the Role of Control and Support Mechanisms in Members’ Sense of Virtual Community. Communication Research 2019, 46(1), 117-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644023
[42]	Zimmermann, M., Schopf, D., Lütteken, N., Liu, Z., Storost, K., et al. Carrot and stick: A game-theoretic approach to motivate cooperative driving through social interaction. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2018, Volume 88, pp. 159-175, ISSN 0968-090X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.01.017
[43]	Leibo, J.Z., Zambaldi, V.F., Lanctot, M., Marecki, J., & Graepel, T. Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmas. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2017, arXiv: 1702.03037v1 [cs.MA] 10 Feb 2017.
[44]	Zhang, T., Liu, Z., Pu, Z., and J. Yi, Peer Incentive Reinforcement Learning for Cooperative Multiagent Games. IEEE Transactions on Games 2023, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 623-636, Dec. https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2022.3196925
[45]	Richter, G., Raban, D.R., Rafaeli, S. (2015). Studying Gamification: The Effect of Rewards and Incentives on Motivation. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L. (eds) Gamification in Education and Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2
[46]	Schmid, L., Chatterjee, K., Hilbe, C. et al. A unified framework of direct and indirect reciprocity. Nat Hum Behav 2021, 5, 1292–1302. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01114-8
[47]	Schmid, L., Shati, P., Hilbe, C. et al. The evolution of indirect reciprocity under action and assessment generosity. Sci Rep 2021, 11, 17443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96932-1
[48]	El Zein, M., Bahrami, B. & Hertwig, R. Shared responsibility in collective decisions. Nat Hum Behav 2019, 3, 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0596-4
[49]	Marston, C., Renedo, A., Miles, S. Community participation is crucial in a pandemic. The Lancet 2020, Vol. 395, issue 10238, pp. 1676-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31054-0
[50]	Keshmirian, A., Deroy, O., Bahrami, B. Many heads are more utilitarian than one, Cognition 2022, Volume 220, 104965, ISSN 0010-0277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104965
[51]	El Zein, M., Bahrami, B. Joining a group diverts regret and responsibility away from the individual. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 2020, 287: 20192251, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2251
[52]	UNECE. Guidelines on the Management and Ownership of Condominium Housing. United Nations, Geneva, pp. 1-107. Retrieved from: https://unece.org/DAM/hlm/documents/Publications/Condo_Guidelines_ECE_HBP_198_en.pdf (last visited April 8, 2024)
[53]	World Health Organization. Roadmap to improve and ensure good indoor ventilation in the context of COVID-19. World Health Organization 2021, pp. 1-38, ISBN 978-92-4-002128-0 (electronic version). Retrieved from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/339857/9789240021280-eng.pdf (last visited April 8, 2024).
[54]	Regione Siciliana. Ordinanza contingibile e urgente n. 53 dell’8 maggio 2021. Ulteriori misure per l’emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19. Regione Siciliana, Palermo, pp. 1-5. Retrieved from: https://www.regione.sicilia.it/sites/default/files/2021-05/Ordinanza-53-08052021.pdf (last visited April 8, 2024).
[55]	Gerretsen, P., Kim, J., Caravaggio, F., Quilty, L. et al. Individual determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. PLOS ONE 2021, 16(11): e0258462, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258462

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fucà, R., Cubico, S. (2024). Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(2), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fucà, R.; Cubico, S. Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2024, 12(2), 83-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fucà R, Cubico S. Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2024;12(2):83-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14,
  author = {Romina Fucà and Serena Cubico},
  title = {Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023
},
  journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
  volume = {12},
  number = {2},
  pages = {83-104},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20241202.14},
  abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges, especially in shared living environments. This study explores the behavior of 39 residents, aged 17 to 91, in a Sicilian condominium, focusing on adherence to socio-juridical mandates and sanitation protocols in communal spaces post-2020 pandemic. The research builds on a previous study that examined the impact of COVID-19 during the first wave, considering factors such as meeting cancellations, social distancing, and mask mandates. The objective is to understand how these factors influenced collective decision-making during and after the pandemic and to assess the alignment of individual actions with collective goals. The present quantitative analysis investigates the trade-offs in collective decision-making, emphasizing the role of shared responsibility in mitigating risks and fostering cooperation. This study underscores the importance of condominium administrators and legal support in promoting cooperative dynamics and socio-juridical precautions for economic resilience. Metrics such as β** (ratio of individual benefit to community benefit) and θ** (ratio of individual self-interest) are introduced to quantify their impact on decision-making processes and societal norms. Finally, this research highlights the significance of coordinated efforts and the need for effective socio-juridical frameworks to enhance communal living and ensure collective well-being during crises.
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023

AU  - Romina Fucà
AU  - Serena Cubico
Y1  - 2024/06/13
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14
T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
SP  - 83
EP  - 104
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7616
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14
AB  - The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges, especially in shared living environments. This study explores the behavior of 39 residents, aged 17 to 91, in a Sicilian condominium, focusing on adherence to socio-juridical mandates and sanitation protocols in communal spaces post-2020 pandemic. The research builds on a previous study that examined the impact of COVID-19 during the first wave, considering factors such as meeting cancellations, social distancing, and mask mandates. The objective is to understand how these factors influenced collective decision-making during and after the pandemic and to assess the alignment of individual actions with collective goals. The present quantitative analysis investigates the trade-offs in collective decision-making, emphasizing the role of shared responsibility in mitigating risks and fostering cooperation. This study underscores the importance of condominium administrators and legal support in promoting cooperative dynamics and socio-juridical precautions for economic resilience. Metrics such as β** (ratio of individual benefit to community benefit) and θ** (ratio of individual self-interest) are introduced to quantify their impact on decision-making processes and societal norms. Finally, this research highlights the significance of coordinated efforts and the need for effective socio-juridical frameworks to enhance communal living and ensure collective well-being during crises.

VL  - 12
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Romina Fucà

Department of Management, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Department of Law and Communication Science, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-1253
Serena Cubico

Department of Management, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9492-775X

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fucà, R., Cubico, S. (2024). Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(2), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fucà, R.; Cubico, S. Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2024, 12(2), 83-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fucà R, Cubico S. Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2024;12(2):83-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14,
  author = {Romina Fucà and Serena Cubico},
  title = {Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023
},
  journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
  volume = {12},
  number = {2},
  pages = {83-104},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20241202.14},
  abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges, especially in shared living environments. This study explores the behavior of 39 residents, aged 17 to 91, in a Sicilian condominium, focusing on adherence to socio-juridical mandates and sanitation protocols in communal spaces post-2020 pandemic. The research builds on a previous study that examined the impact of COVID-19 during the first wave, considering factors such as meeting cancellations, social distancing, and mask mandates. The objective is to understand how these factors influenced collective decision-making during and after the pandemic and to assess the alignment of individual actions with collective goals. The present quantitative analysis investigates the trade-offs in collective decision-making, emphasizing the role of shared responsibility in mitigating risks and fostering cooperation. This study underscores the importance of condominium administrators and legal support in promoting cooperative dynamics and socio-juridical precautions for economic resilience. Metrics such as β** (ratio of individual benefit to community benefit) and θ** (ratio of individual self-interest) are introduced to quantify their impact on decision-making processes and societal norms. Finally, this research highlights the significance of coordinated efforts and the need for effective socio-juridical frameworks to enhance communal living and ensure collective well-being during crises.
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Navigating Organization Dynamics: The Real-World Example of Condominium Life in Sicily During the COVID-19 Era in Late 2022-2023

AU  - Romina Fucà
AU  - Serena Cubico
Y1  - 2024/06/13
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14
T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
SP  - 83
EP  - 104
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7616
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20241202.14
AB  - The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges, especially in shared living environments. This study explores the behavior of 39 residents, aged 17 to 91, in a Sicilian condominium, focusing on adherence to socio-juridical mandates and sanitation protocols in communal spaces post-2020 pandemic. The research builds on a previous study that examined the impact of COVID-19 during the first wave, considering factors such as meeting cancellations, social distancing, and mask mandates. The objective is to understand how these factors influenced collective decision-making during and after the pandemic and to assess the alignment of individual actions with collective goals. The present quantitative analysis investigates the trade-offs in collective decision-making, emphasizing the role of shared responsibility in mitigating risks and fostering cooperation. This study underscores the importance of condominium administrators and legal support in promoting cooperative dynamics and socio-juridical precautions for economic resilience. Metrics such as β** (ratio of individual benefit to community benefit) and θ** (ratio of individual self-interest) are introduced to quantify their impact on decision-making processes and societal norms. Finally, this research highlights the significance of coordinated efforts and the need for effective socio-juridical frameworks to enhance communal living and ensure collective well-being during crises.

VL  - 12
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download